| manuscript . block number : A6.3 -- folio . line : 1b.3 -- tradition : no trad. -- 718 NS -- 1598 AD | ||
| Sanskrit | pra-yas'o ru-pabhedena sa-hacaryya-cca kutracit stri-pum*napum*sakam* (4) jn~eyam* tadvis'es*avidhe kvacit | |
| phrase | Newari | English |
| 1 | stri-lim* pum*lim*ga napum*sakalim*ga svata- lim*ga the sehuna | here three genders feminine, masculine, neuter are to be known |
| Add comment to manuscript entry A6.3 |
| Amarakosa | 1.1.3.1 | |||
| Sanskrit | pra-yas'o rupabhedena, sa-hacarya-cca kutracit stri-pum*napum*sakam* jn~eyam*, tadvis'es*avidheh* kvacit | |||
| synonym | Sanskrit | Nepali | English | |
| comment / problem | ||||
| 1 | SH : no message pra-yas'ah* (bahudha-) rupabhedena (s'abdaka- bhinna - bhinna ru-pale) stri-pum*napum*sakam (stri-lin^ga - pum*lin^ga - napum*saka lin^ga) jn~eyam (ja-nnu pardacha) kutracit (kahim*kahim*) sa-hacarya-t ca (aghi pachi raheka- s'abda-ntaraka- lin^ga-nusa-ra pani) [stri-pum*napum*sakam* jn~eyam - stri-lin^ga pum*lin^ga napum*sakalin^ga ja-nnu pardacha] kvacit (kahi-m*) tadvis'es*avidheh* (lin^ga vis'es*ako spas*t*a vidha-na - garna-le) stri-pum*napum*sakam* jn~eyam [stri-lin^ga pum*lin^ga napum*sakalin^ga ja-nnu pardacha] Deshmukh: Every word being set out in due form, feminine or masculine gender is to be inferred mostly by the grammatical form, in some places by proximity, and occasionally from specific reference. (from compilation) | |||
| 2 | SH : no message see p. 2 for further explanation (from compilation) | |||
| Add comment to Amarakosa reference entry 1.1.3.1 |
|
Show all manuscript blocks associated with Amarakosa reference 1.1.3.1 |